Mississippi Wire Glass Co. v. Wire Glass Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Mississippi Wire Glass Co. v. Wire Glass Co.

137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5039

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 10, 1905

DocketNo. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 137 F. 1023 (Mississippi Wire Glass Co. v. Wire Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mississippi Wire Glass Co. v. Wire Glass Co., 137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5039 (circtedpa 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

Without discussing the facts in detail at this preliminary stage of the litigation, I think it is enough to say now that the equities of the case appear to be sufficiently in favor of the complainant to justify the court in preserving the present status until final hearing. It is therefore ordered that complainant give bond in the usual form in the sum of $2,500, and that upon the filing thereof a preliminary injunction issue in accordance with the third and fourth prayers of the bill. For cause shown, either party may move to increase or reduce the amount of the bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

Without discussing the facts in detail at this preliminary stage of the litigation, I think it is enough to say now that the equities of the case appear to be sufficiently in favor of the complainant to justify the court in preserving the present status until final hearing. It is therefore ordered that complainant give bond in the usual form in the sum of $2,500, and that upon the filing thereof a preliminary injunction issue in accordance with the third and fourth prayers of the bill. For cause shown, either party may move to increase or reduce the amount of the bond.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mississippi-wire-glass-co-v-wire-glass-co-circtedpa-1905.