Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Jimmy McGee

266 So. 3d 1003
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 4, 2019
DocketNO. 2018-JP-01578-SCT
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 So. 3d 1003 (Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Jimmy McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Jimmy McGee, 266 So. 3d 1003 (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

BEAM, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶1. The Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance filed a formal complaint against Justice Court Judge Jimmy McGee, outlining multiple allegations of judicial misconduct. The Commission and Judge McGee entered into an agreed stipulation of facts and recommended a public reprimand and a fine of $ 1,683.34. The Commission and Judge McGee filed a joint motion for approval of the recommendation with this Court. After consideration, we affirm the Commission's recommendation of a public reprimand and $ 1,683.34 fine.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2. Judge McGee serves as a justice court judge for Alcorn County, Mississippi, Post Two. He agreed to the following determinations made by the Commission.

Failing to Issue Civil Rulings in a Timely Manner

¶3. Judge McGee failed to issue final orders on civil matters after conducting hearings and holding cases in abeyance. The Commission found that, "on March 25, 2014, Angela Hight filed a complaint in Cause No. 1072-427, Angela Diane Hight v. Trustmark National Bank and Jeremy Todd Hight . On May 6, 2014, Todd Hight filed his answer and requested a continuance." Trustmark filed its answer on the same day. On August 8, 2014, Judge McGee presided over a two-hour hearing in the case, during which all parties appeared, presented evidence, and called witnesses. Following the hearing, Judge McGee informed the parties "he was going to hold the case in abeyance and would have a ruling by August 26, 2014." But Judge McGee "failed to make a ruling in the case."

¶4. "[T]he Commission discovered [twenty-seven] similar cases establishing a pattern of conduct in which [Judge McGee] conducted hearings in civil cases, held the cases in abeyance, and failed to rule on the matter." Judge McGee since has adjudicated all of the cases of which he still had jurisdiction.

Issuing an Order in a Civil Case without Conducting a Hearing on the Merits

¶5. The Commission found that, "on June 21, 2016, Rick Quinn filed complaints in Cause No. 1079-448, Rick Quinn v. Lawrence "Larry" Goodine , and Cause No. 1079-447, Rick Quinn v. Amanda Lee Alexander ." Rick Quinn claimed in each case that the opposing party had misappropriated his property, and Quinn requested money damages. Judge McGee granted default judgments in both cases. "On October 4, 2016, Judge McGee, sua sponte , entered an order setting aside both default judgments." The order stated that "the default judgments were entered in error because counsel for both sides had previously agreed to reset the cases."

¶6. On October 25, 2016, Larry Goodine and Amanda Alexander jointly filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, claiming that because the case had begun as a criminal matter in Alcorn County Circuit Court, the Alcorn County Justice Court did not have jurisdiction. Therefore, the matter should have been before the circuit court. A motion hearing occurred on December 21, 2016, after which Judge McGee dismissed the case against Amanda Alexander. Judge McGee said he would hear Larry Goodine's case at a later date.

¶7. On July 19, 2017, Judge McGee denied Goodine's motion to dismiss, and he granted Rick Quinn a judgment without a hearing on the merits. Because Larry Goodine thereafter filed a notice of appeal in circuit court, Judge McGee lacks jurisdiction to take remedial action in the case.

Dismissed Allegation of Retaliation

¶8. Initially, the Commission had charged Judge McGee with retaliatory action against former Alcorn County Justice Court Clerk Jone Dixon based on Judge McGee's appearance before the Alcorn County Board of Supervisors during executive session. But after further investigation and review of affidavits provided by Judge McGee, the Commission determined that Judge McGee had not engaged in any form of retaliation.

¶9. Judge McGee stipulated that his conduct violated the following canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct: Canons 1, 2A, 3A, 3B(1), 3B(2), 3B(8), and 3C(1). Judge McGee stipulated also that such actions constituted misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the judicial office into disrepute pursuant to article 6, section 177A, of the Mississippi Constitution. The Commission and Judge McGee agreed to a proposed recommendation of a public reprimand and a $ 1,683.34 fine.

ANALYSIS

¶10. The Mississippi Constitution vests this Court with the sole power to impose sanctions in judicial misconduct matters. Miss. Const. art. 6, § 177A. Thus, this Court "must undertake an independent inquiry of the case record." Miss. Comm'n on Judicial Performance v. Smith , 109 So.3d 95 , 98 (Miss. 2013) (citing In re Anderson , 412 So.2d 743 , 746 (Miss. 1982) ). "In so doing, this Court accords 'careful consideration [to] the findings of fact and recommendations of the Commission, or its committee, which has had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witnesses.' " Id. (alteration in original) (quoting In re Anderson , 412 So.2d at 746 ). We may "accept, reject, or modify" the Commission's findings and recommendations. Id. (quoting Miss. Comm'n on Judicial Performance R.10(E) ).

¶11. In determining the appropriate sanctions for judicial misconduct, the following factors are considered:

(1) the length and character of the judge's public service; (2) whether there is any prior caselaw on point; (3) the magnitude of the offense and the harm suffered; (4) whether the misconduct is an isolated incident or evidences a pattern of conduct; (5) whether the conduct was willful, intended to deprive the public of assets, or if it exploited the judge's position; and (6) the presence or absence of mitigating or aggravating factors.

Miss. Comm'n on Judicial Performance v. Curry , 249 So.3d 369 , 375 (Miss. 2018) (quoting Miss. Comm'n on Judicial Performance v. Vess , 227 So.3d 952 , 956-57 (Miss. 2017) ).

(1) Length and Character of Judge McGee's Public Service

¶12. Judge McGee has served a justice court judge in Alcorn County for eighteen years.

(2) Prior Caselaw

¶13. As the Commission found, Judge McGee failed to timely rule in twenty-eight civil cases. One case had not been resolved for seven years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 3d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mississippi-commission-on-judicial-performance-v-jimmy-mcgee-miss-2019.