Mission of Immaculate Virgin v. Antonio B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mission of Immaculate Virgin v. Antonio B.

246 A.D.2d 547, 666 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 547 (Mission of Immaculate Virgin v. Antonio B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mission of Immaculate Virgin v. Antonio B., 246 A.D.2d 547, 666 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, the father appeals from (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated December 13, 1994, which, after a hearing, found, inter alia, that he had permanently neglected the subject child, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court, dated December 18, 1995, which, after a hearing, terminated his parental rights.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order dated December 13, 1994, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition dated December 18, 1995; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the record amply supports the Family Court’s determination that Zyrina was a permanently neglected child (see, Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 AD2d 769).

[548]*548The father’s remaining contention lacks merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI