Mission Insurance v. Underwood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mission Insurance v. Underwood

257 S.E.2d 48, 149 Ga. App. 703, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1995

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 24, 1979

Docket57502

StatusPublished

This text of 257 S.E.2d 48 (Mission Insurance v. Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mission Insurance v. Underwood, 257 S.E.2d 48, 149 Ga. App. 703, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1995 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court affirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits to claimant-appellee. The only issue argued by appellant is whether the evidence authorized the award. An examination of the evidence reveals that the award was authorized. There being some evidence in support of the award, we will not interfere with the judgment. Howard Sheppard, Inc. v. McGowan, 137 Ga. App. 408, 410 (224 SE2d 65); Employers Ins. Co. v. Amerson, 109 Ga. App. 275 (136 SE2d 12).

There being a litigable issue as to the existence as opposed to the sufficiency of evidence to support the award, we deny appellee’s motion for damages based upon a frivolous appeal brought for purposes of delay only. Code Ann. § 6-1801.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court affirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits to claimant-appellee. The only issue argued by appellant is whether the evidence authorized the award. An examination of the evidence reveals that the award was authorized. There being some evidence in support of the award, we will not interfere with the judgment. Howard Sheppard, Inc. v. McGowan, 137 Ga. App. 408, 410 (224 SE2d 65); Employers Ins. Co. v. Amerson, 109 Ga. App. 275 (136 SE2d 12).

There being a litigable issue as to the existence as opposed to the sufficiency of evidence to support the award, we deny appellee’s motion for damages based upon a frivolous appeal brought for purposes of delay only. Code Ann. § 6-1801.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 S.E.2d 48, 149 Ga. App. 703, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mission-insurance-v-underwood-gactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack