Miss Universe, Inc. v. Alfred Patricelli
386 F.2d 997, 155 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 289
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 9, 1967·No. 31556_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
The order of Chief Judge Timbers, D.C., 271 F.Supp. 104, is affirmed. However, the merits of the controversy, including the validity of plaintiff’s serv-icemarks, must await the trial. This decision is not intended to foreclose the defendant from using a title descriptive of his contest to select a representative from the United States of America for the World Beauty Pageant in London, England, such as Miss World — USA.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miss Universe, Inc. v. Alfred Patricelli, 386 F.2d 997, 155 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 289 (2d Cir. 1967).
386 F.2d 997 (Miss Universe, Inc. v. Alfred Patricelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mrs. United States National Pageant, Inc. v. Miss United States of America Organization, LLC
875 F. Supp. 2d 211 (W.D. New York, 2012)
MISS UNIVERSE, LP, LLLP v. Villegas
672 F. Supp. 2d 575 (S.D. New York, 2009)
Fourth Toro Family Ltd. Partnership v. PV Bakery, Inc.
88 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Miss Universe, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Alfred Patricelli D/B/A Miss Venus U.S.A. Pageant, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
753 F.2d 235 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Kazmaier v. Wooten
593 F. Supp. 390 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)
American Rice, Inc. v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Ass'n
532 F. Supp. 1376 (S.D. Texas, 1982)
Parrot Jungle, Inc. v. Parrot Jungle, Inc.
512 F. Supp. 266 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Cuban Cigar Brands N. v. v. Upmann International, Inc.
457 F. Supp. 1090 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Miss Universe, Inc. v. Alfred Patricelli
408 F.2d 506 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Elmer Davis, AKA Robert Brown v. Leroy R. Eide
386 F.2d 997 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)