Miss Hazel Hood v. Miss Emma Burnett
This text of 450 F.2d 941 (Miss Hazel Hood v. Miss Emma Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
450 F.2d 941
Miss Hazel HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Miss Emma BURNETT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-2488 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 23, 1971.
G. Seals Aiken, John L. Respess, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Latimer, Haddon & Stanfield, Alfred L. Evans, Jr., J. Lee Perry, A. C. Latimer, William F. Lee, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.2d 941, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miss-hazel-hood-v-miss-emma-burnett-ca5-1971.