Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc.

201 So. 2d 84, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1967·No. No. 66-958·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellee, an alleged assignee of certain accounts payable due from the appellant to a third party. We reverse.

The record on appeal fails to demonstrate that there was no genuine issue of a material fact under the issues as made by the original complaint and general denial answer thereto. See: Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So.2d 780; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co., Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 605; Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601.

This cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of receiving evidence on the issues as made by the pleadings and rendition of a final judgment thereon.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc., 201 So. 2d 84, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

201 So. 2d 84 (Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley
175 So. 2d 780 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Visingardi v. Tirone
193 So. 2d 601 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co.
191 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)