Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc.

201 So. 2d 84, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1967

DocketNo. 66-958

StatusPublished

This text of 201 So. 2d 84 (Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc., 201 So. 2d 84, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellee, an alleged assignee of certain accounts payable due from the appellant to a third party. We reverse.

The record on appeal fails to demonstrate that there was no genuine issue of a material fact under the issues as made by the original complaint and general denial answer thereto. See: Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So.2d 780; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co., Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 605; Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601.

This cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of receiving evidence on the issues as made by the pleadings and rendition of a final judgment thereon.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI