Misner v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1995·No. 95-50492·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50492

Summary Calendar

ELBERT MISNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY WILLIAMS, BRIAN CROUCH, BONNIE CREAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-434

- - - - - - - - - -

November 3, 1995

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Elbert Misner appeals from the district court's denial of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Misner argues that he was denied access to the courts, that he was denied adequate medical treatment, and that his incoming mail was opened without his consent.

We have reviewed the record and the Magistrate Judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

*

Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

No. 95-50492

-2-

essentially the reasons given by the Magistrate Judge. Misner v. Williams, No. SA-94-CA-434 (W.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Misner v. Williams, (5th Cir. 1995).

Misner v. Williams (Misner v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related