Miskey's Appeal

4 A. 744, 1 Sadler 407
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 1, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We discover no merit in tbis appeal. It is not necessary that tbe costs be taxed before tbe case is reviewed by tbis court. By our judgment or decree, tbe liability of a party to pay costs may be determined; but tbe several items thereof remain to be taxed by tbe court below. We will not review its action therein except in a flagrant case. Here no cause is shown for disturbing its decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at tbe cost of tbe appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miskey's Appeal, 4 A. 744, 1 Sadler 407 (Pa. 1886).

4 A. 744 (Miskey's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fife v. the Great A. & P. Tea Co.
82 A.2d 271 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Hartley v. Weideman
28 Pa. Super. 50 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)