Mishler v. Zakheim
625 So. 2d 81, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9741, 1993 WL 392244
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1993·No. No. 92-2499·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because we find clear error in the trial court’s exclusion of the testimony of the plaintiffs’ proposed expert witnesses under section 766.102, Florida Statutes (1991), the summary judgment entered below on that basis is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial as to all defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mishler v. Zakheim, 625 So. 2d 81, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9741, 1993 WL 392244 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
625 So. 2d 81 (Mishler v. Zakheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Variety Children's Hosp. v. Mishler
670 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)