Miseirvitch v. Coulter & McKenzie Machine Co.
This text of 86 A.D.2d 864 (Miseirvitch v. Coulter & McKenzie Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant third-party plaintiff Egan Machinery Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated January 22, 1981, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and directed that it accept service of plaintiff’s bill of particulars. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements payable by plaintiff, motion granted and complaint dismissed. (See Wolkowicki v Rizzo, 43 AD2d 838.) Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.D.2d 864, 450 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miseirvitch-v-coulter-mckenzie-machine-co-nyappdiv-1982.