Miseirvitch v. Coulter & McKenzie Machine Co.

86 A.D.2d 864, 450 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15496

This text of 86 A.D.2d 864 (Miseirvitch v. Coulter & McKenzie Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miseirvitch v. Coulter & McKenzie Machine Co., 86 A.D.2d 864, 450 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant third-party plaintiff Egan Machinery Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated January 22, 1981, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and directed that it accept service of plaintiff’s bill of particulars. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements payable by plaintiff, motion granted and complaint dismissed. (See Wolkowicki v Rizzo, 43 AD2d 838.) Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolkowicki v. Rizzo
43 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.2d 864, 450 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miseirvitch-v-coulter-mckenzie-machine-co-nyappdiv-1982.