Misch v. Mayhew

51 Cal. 514
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1876·No. No. 5047·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The judgment of the court below is erroneous. The language of section 1116 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which fixes the time when the list of alleged illegal voters shall be served, is equivalent to a requirement that the opposite party shall have three days’ notice of the illegal votes which the party serving the list expects to prove at the trial. The case is, therefore, covered by section 12 of the same code, and a list served on the seventh of December could properly be relied upon and proven at the trial on the tenth of December.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, and the County Court is directed to retry the issues made by the statement of the contestant and the answer of defendant thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Misch v. Mayhew, 51 Cal. 514 (Cal. 1876).

51 Cal. 514 (Misch v. Mayhew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Superior Court (Finch)
200 Cal. App. 3d 1546 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
People v. Harvey
193 Cal. App. 3d 767 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
McCulloch v. Bianchini
292 P. 617 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1930)
Petition of Los Angeles Trust Co.
112 P. 56 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
In re L.A. Tr. Co.
158 Cal. 603 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Reclamation District No. 765 v. McPhee
109 P. 1106 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.
91 P. 98 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Bank of Lemoore v. Fulgham
90 P. 936 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Hannah v. Green
76 P. 708 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Bellmer v. Blessington
68 P. 111 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Dingley v. McDonald
56 P. 790 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Bates v. Howard
38 P. 715 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Foreman v. Boyle
26 P. 94 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Ducheneau v. Hiram House
4 Utah 363 (Utah Supreme Court, 1886)
Stinson v. Sweeney
17 Nev. 309 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1883)