Misak v. Thibaudeau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Misak v. Thibaudeau

243 A.D. 672

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 672 (Misak v. Thibaudeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Misak v. Thibaudeau, 243 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Adams v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (82 App. Div. 354); Poland v. United Traction Co. (107 id. 561); Powers v. Conn. Co. (82 Conn. 665); Gargan v. West End St. R. Co. (176 Mass. 106). All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for damages for neglect in the prosecution of an action.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Adams v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (82 App. Div. 354); Poland v. United Traction Co. (107 id. 561); Powers v. Conn. Co. (82 Conn. 665); Gargan v. West End St. R. Co. (176 Mass. 106). All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for damages for neglect in the prosecution of an action.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/misak-v-thibaudeau-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack