Misak v. Thibaudeau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Misak v. Thibaudeau

243 A.D. 672

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Adams v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (82 App. Div. 354); Poland v. United Traction Co. (107 id. 561); Powers v. Conn. Co. (82 Conn. 665); Gargan v. West End St. R. Co. (176 Mass. 106). All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for damages for neglect in the prosecution of an action.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Adams v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (82 App. Div. 354); Poland v. United Traction Co. (107 id. 561); Powers v. Conn. Co. (82 Conn. 665); Gargan v. West End St. R. Co. (176 Mass. 106). All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for damages for neglect in the prosecution of an action.)

Misak v. Thibaudeau, 243 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 672 (Misak v. Thibaudeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related