Mirza Kunjundzic v. United States
This text of 514 F. App'x 346 (Mirza Kunjundzic v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Mirza Kunjundzic petitions for permission to appeal the district court’s order denying the relief he requested in his pro se pretrial motions in his criminal case. See Fed. R.App. P. 5. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise ju *347 risdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Kunjundzic seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. See United States v. North Am. Coal Exch., 676 F.2d 99, 100 (4th Cir.1982). Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 F. App'x 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirza-kunjundzic-v-united-states-ca4-2013.