Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst.

2010 Ohio 3153
CourtOhio Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 12, 2010
Docket2009-08969-AD
StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 3153 (Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst., 2010 Ohio 3153 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

[Cite as Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst., 2010-Ohio-3153.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ARTHUR L. MIRTO

Plaintiff

v.

TRUMBULL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Defendant

Case No. 2009-08969-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 1} 1) On October 8, 2009, a van owned by plaintiff, Arthur L. Mirto, was damaged by an employee of defendant, Trumbull Correctional Institution (TCI). Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover damages in the amount of $596.84, the total cost of vehicle repair. In his complaint, plaintiff advised he carries insurance coverage for vehicle repair with a $250.00 deductible provision and he acknowledged his insurer paid $346.84 toward the cost of repair. Pursuant to the provisions of R.C. 2743.02(D)1, plaintiff’s damage claim is limited to $250.00, his insurance coverage deductible. Plaintiff submitted the $25.00 filing fee and he has requested reimbursement of that cost along with his damage claim. {¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for the damage to plaintiff’s vehicle.

1 R.C. 2743.02(D) provides in pertinent part: “(D) Recoveries against the states shall be reduced by the aggregate of insurance proceeds, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 3} 1) Negligence on the part of defendant has been established. Johnson v. State Highway Patrol (2002), 2001-12347-AD; Zapf v. Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 2006-07511-AD, 2007-Ohio-3104; Landman v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 2007-01801-AD, 2007-Ohio-2414; Hutchison v. State Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-06318-AD, 2008-Ohio-5627; Kovacik v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-09619-AD, 2009-Ohio-1592. {¶ 4} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $250.00, plus the $25.00 filing fee which may be reimbursed as compensable costs pursuant to R.C. 2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990.

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

TRUMBULL CORRECTION INSTITUTION

disability award, or other collateral recovery received by the claimant.” ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $275.00, which includes the filing fee. Court costs are assessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Arthur L. Mirto Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 5677 Stanford Avenue Department of Rehabilitation Austintown, Ohio 44515 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222 RDK/laa 2/25 Filed 3/12/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 7/1/10

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 3153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirto-v-trumbull-correctional-inst-ohioctcl-2010.