Mirta Zorilla v. Lake James Recreational Facilities, Inc.
This text of Mirta Zorilla v. Lake James Recreational Facilities, Inc. (Mirta Zorilla v. Lake James Recreational Facilities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
MIRTA ZORILLA, Appellant,
LAKE JAMES RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, INC., Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on April 16, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 8th day of October, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mirta Zorilla v. Lake James Recreational Facilities, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirta-zorilla-v-lake-james-recreational-facilities-texapp-2009.