Mirta Ramos, Individually, as Spouse of Francisco Velasquez Jr. and as Next Friend of Z. M. v. A. M. v. E. J. v. A. J. v. and M. F. v. Minor Children of Francisco Velasquez Jr. v. Texas Department of Public Safety
This text of Mirta Ramos, Individually, as Spouse of Francisco Velasquez Jr. and as Next Friend of Z. M. v. A. M. v. E. J. v. A. J. v. and M. F. v. Minor Children of Francisco Velasquez Jr. v. Texas Department of Public Safety (Mirta Ramos, Individually, as Spouse of Francisco Velasquez Jr. and as Next Friend of Z. M. v. A. M. v. E. J. v. A. J. v. and M. F. v. Minor Children of Francisco Velasquez Jr. v. Texas Department of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00497-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MIRTA RAMOS, INDIVIDUALLY, AS SPOUSE OF FRANCISCO VELASQUEZ JR. AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF Z. M. V., A. M. V., E. J. V., A. J. V. AND M. F. V., MINOR CHILDREN OF FRANCISCO VELASQUEZ JR., DECEASED, Appellant,
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 30, 2011. On
November 7, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of
receipt of the notice, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 21st day of December, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mirta Ramos, Individually, as Spouse of Francisco Velasquez Jr. and as Next Friend of Z. M. v. A. M. v. E. J. v. A. J. v. and M. F. v. Minor Children of Francisco Velasquez Jr. v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirta-ramos-individually-as-spouse-of-francisco-velasquez-jr-and-as-next-texapp-2011.