Mirta Bencomo v. Costa Crociere, S.P.A. Company
This text of 476 F. App'x 232 (Mirta Bencomo v. Costa Crociere, S.P.A. Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, Mirta Bencomo, slipped on a puddle near the pool onboard the Defendant’s cruise ship, the Costa Atlántica. Alleging various theories of negligence, Bencomo sued Costa Crociere, S.P.A. Company (“Costa”). The district court granted Costa’s motion for summary judgment. This is Bencomo’s appeal.
After a review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we affirm. Bencomo cannot establish that Costa had a duty to correct or warn passengers about the allegedly dangerous condition because Costa did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the puddle. See Keefe v. Bahama *233 Cruise Line, Inc., 867 F.2d 1318, 1322 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Nothing in the record creates a genuine dispute regarding this issue.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirta-bencomo-v-costa-crociere-spa-company-ca11-2012.