Mirsky v. . Borden
143 N.E. 768, 237 N.Y. 625, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 928
This text of 143 N.E. 768 (Mirsky v. . Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mirsky v. . Borden, 143 N.E. 768, 237 N.Y. 625, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 928 (N.Y. 1924).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: His cock, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 N.E. 768, 237 N.Y. 625, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirsky-v-borden-ny-1924.