Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp.

124 So. 722, 98 Fla. 953

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Fla. 946 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam (No. 8773).

It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the orders appealed from in this case be *954 and they are hereby affirmed on the' authority of the decision this day rendered in the case of Mirror Lake Company v. Kirk Securities Company (No. 8774), and with like instructions as in said Mirror Lake Company v. Kirk Securities Company as to taxing of costs accumulated by reason of appointment of receiver under original bill.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam (No. 8773).

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp., 124 So. 722, 98 Fla. 953 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

124 So. 722 (Mirror Lake Co. v. Kirk Securities Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.