Miroth v. County of Trinity

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 5, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00460·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Patricia A. E. Miroth, et al., No. 2:22-cv-00460-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. County of Trinity, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs have each submitted applications to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 18 | § 1915. Mot. by Patricia A. E. Miroth, ECF No. 2; Mot. by Stanley R. Miroth, ECF No. 3. “To 19 | satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, applicants must demonstrate that because of 20 | poverty, they cannot meet court costs and still provide themselves, and any dependents, with the 21 | necessities of life.” McKinley v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:21-754, 2021 WL 3007162, at *1 (E.D. 22 | Cal. July 15, 2021) (citation omitted). The court finds the applications make the required 23 | showing and thus GRANTS the requests to proceed in forma pauperis. 24 This order resolves ECF Nos. 2 & 3. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 | DATED: April 4, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miroth v. County of Trinity, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Miroth v. County of Trinity (Miroth v. County of Trinity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related