Mironer v. Steele
This text of 479 P.3d 153 (Mironer v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JAN-2021 07:50 AM Dkt. 34 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
EUGENE MIRONER AND EKATERINA MIRONER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JESSIE JAMES STEELE, Defendant-Appellant, and JOHN DOES 1-20 AND JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 5RC-17-1-0699)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.)
Defendant-Appellant Jesse James Steele (Steele) appeals from the Judgment for Possession and the Writ of Possession, filed on November 26, 2018, in the District Court of the Fifth Circuit (District Court).1 Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve Steele's point of error as follows: Steele contends he is an "Internationally Protected Person under Geneva IV USC 18 §2441, a Hawaiian-Subject and a Tenant in Wainiha Ahupua#a Halele#a District on the Island of
1 The Honorable Joe P. Moss presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Kauai located within the Hawaiian Islands which is also known as the Sandwich Islands[,]" and that "[u]nder USC 28 §91 Hawai#i the State of Hawaii and United States of America has no Hawaiian Islands or Sandwich Islands to retain Jurisdiction over Internationally Protected Persons on Internationally Protected Property." We construe Steele's Opening Brief as challenging the District Court's jurisdiction over him in this action. The District Court has "jurisdiction in ejectment proceedings where the title to real estate does not come in question at the trial of the action." Hawaii Revised Statutes § 604-6 (2016). The record on appeal does not indicate Steele contested title in the ejectment proceeding below. Therefore, the District Court had jurisdiction over the ejectment proceeding. "Individuals claiming to be citizens of the Kingdom [of Hawai#i] and not of the State are not exempt from application of the State's laws." State v. Kaulia, 128 Hawai#i 479, 487, 291 P.3d 377, 385 (2013). "[W]e reaffirm that whatever may be said regarding the lawfulness of its origins, the State of Hawai#i is now, a lawful government." Id. (brackets, quotation marks, ellipsis, and citation omitted). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment for Possession and the Writ of Possession, filed on November 26, 2018, in the District Court of the Fifth Circuit is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 7, 2021.
On the briefs: /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge Jesse James Steele, Self-Represented Defendant- /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Appellant. Associate Judge
Donna E. Richards, /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Mark R. Zenger, Associate Judge (Richards and Zenger) for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 P.3d 153, 148 Haw. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mironer-v-steele-hawapp-2021.