Mirll v. University of Central Oklahoma

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TERESA MIRLL, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-19-1143-G STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ) OKLAHOMA et al., ) Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 3) filed by Defendant State of Oklahoma ex rel. University of Central Oklahoma. The Motion seeks dismissal of the claims asserted in Plaintiff’s initial Complaint (Doc. No. 1-1). On January 7, 2020, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff?s Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2020.

United States District Judge