Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.

54 A.D.2d 976, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14917

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action inter alia on two written retainer agreements, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 29, 1975, which, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There is support in the record for Special Term’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia on two written retainer agreements, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 29, 1975, which, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There is support in the record for Special Term’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp., 54 A.D.2d 976, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 976 (Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.