Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.

Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.

54 A.D.2d 976, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 29, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 976 (Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein & Gordon, P. C. v. Arundel Corp., 54 A.D.2d 976, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In an action inter alia on two written retainer agreements, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 29, 1975, which, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There is support in the record for Special Term’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 976, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirkin-barre-saltzstein-gordon-p-c-v-arundel-corp-nyappdiv-1976.