Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh

23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 929, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 304

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 30, 2011·No. SC 18813·Published

Opinion

The defendant Maria Varone’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 61 (AC 30608), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?”

*930 Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18813. Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant Maria Varone’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 61 (AC 30608), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?”

*930 Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18813. Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh, 23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 929, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 304 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

23 A.3d 724 (Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related