Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh

Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh

23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 929, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 304
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 30, 2011
DocketSC 18813
StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.3d 724 (Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh, 23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 929, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 304 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The defendant Maria Varone’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 61 (AC 30608), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?”
*930 Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18813. Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh
18 A.3d 591 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.3d 724, 301 Conn. 929, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirjavadi-v-vakilzadeh-conn-2011.