Miriah Elizabeth Crenshaw v. Samir Hemani
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-24-00476-CV
MIRIAH ELIZABETH CRENSHAW, Appellant V.
SAMIR HEMANI, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2024-006168-1
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on January 15, 2025. On January 27, 2025, we notified appellant that the brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: March 13, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miriah Elizabeth Crenshaw v. Samir Hemani (Miriah Elizabeth Crenshaw v. Samir Hemani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.