Mires v. State

55 S.W.2d 96, 122 Tex. Crim. 328, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 736
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 1932
DocketNo. 15475.
StatusPublished

This text of 55 S.W.2d 96 (Mires v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mires v. State, 55 S.W.2d 96, 122 Tex. Crim. 328, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 736 (Tex. 1932).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of chickens is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

From the record it appears that the appellant is at large by virtue of an appeal bond. The bond is defective in that it fails to show that it was approved by the sheriff. See article 818, C.. C. P., 1925. In the absence of a sufficient bond, it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal, which is accordingly done, with the statement, however, that the appeal will be reinstated upon the filing in the court below, a bond in compliance with the statute, article 835, C. C. P., and a certified copy thereof in this court within fifteen days.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 S.W.2d 96, 122 Tex. Crim. 328, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mires-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.