Mirelez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mirelez v. State

804 So. 2d 622, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 561, 2002 WL 90821

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 2002

DocketNo. 5D01-2263

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 804 So. 2d 622 (Mirelez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mirelez v. State, 804 So. 2d 622, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 561, 2002 WL 90821 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to correct an inconsistency between the orally pronounced sentence and the written sentence as to Count XIV. The trial court orally pronounced a five year sentence while the written sentence imposed a prison term of 15 years for this count. The error is clear and its correction does not change the aggregate sentence appellant received.

Therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed and the matter is remanded for correction of the sentence as to Count XIV.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI