Mirch v. State of New York Office of Court Administration
490 N.E.2d 546, 67 N.Y.2d 620, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16720
This text of 490 N.E.2d 546 (Mirch v. State of New York Office of Court Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mirch v. State of New York Office of Court Administration, 490 N.E.2d 546, 67 N.Y.2d 620, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16720 (N.Y. 1986).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 965).
Concur: Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Chief Judge Wachtler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mirch v. State of New York Office of Court Administration
111 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
490 N.E.2d 546, 67 N.Y.2d 620, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirch-v-state-of-new-york-office-of-court-administration-ny-1986.