Miravalle v. Dean Team-Kirkwood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miravalle v. Dean Team-Kirkwood

399 S.W.3d 41, 2013 WL 1316027

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 2013·No. No. ED 98659·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dean Team Kirkwood, Inc. and Colin Berndt (collectively “Dean Team”) appeal the trial court’s judgment denying their motion to compel arbitration and stay action pending completion of binding arbitration. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dean Team Kirkwood, Inc. and Colin Berndt (collectively “Dean Team”) appeal the trial court’s judgment denying their motion to compel arbitration and stay action pending completion of binding arbitration. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Miravalle v. Dean Team-Kirkwood, 399 S.W.3d 41, 2013 WL 1316027 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 41 (Miravalle v. Dean Team-Kirkwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.