Miranda v. Superior Court Department

121 N.E.3d 187, 482 Mass. 1008
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 25, 2019
DocketSJC 12590
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E.3d 187 (Miranda v. Superior Court Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miranda v. Superior Court Department, 121 N.E.3d 187, 482 Mass. 1008 (Mass. 2019).

Opinion

RESCRIPT

Christian Miranda appeals from a judgment of the county court denying, without a hearing, his complaint seeking relief in the nature of certiorari pursuant to G. L. c. 249, § 4. In that complaint, Miranda, who has been convicted of certain drug-related offenses, sought relief from an order of the Superior Court denying his motion for postconviction discovery. That order was subject to review in the ordinary appellate process. "It would be hard to find any principle more fully established in our practice than the principle that neither mandamus nor certiorari is to be used as a substitute for ordinary appellate procedure or used at any time when there is another adequate remedy." Myrick v. Superior Court Dep't , 479 Mass. 1012 , 1012, 94 N.E.3d 838 (2018), quoting Rines v. Justices of the Superior Court , 330 Mass. 368 , 371, 113 N.E.2d 817 (1953). The single justice properly denied relief.

Judgment affirmed .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rines v. Justices of the Superior Court
113 N.E.2d 817 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1953)
Myrick v. Superior Court Department
94 N.E.3d 838 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.E.3d 187, 482 Mass. 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miranda-v-superior-court-department-mass-2019.