Miranda v. State
530 So. 2d 1103, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, 1988 WL 96060
Opinion
As in Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we conclude that the evidence of the appellant’s participation in the sale of cocaine to undercover police supports his conviction of trafficking. Nonetheless, there is no proof of an express or implied agreement to commit the offense and his conviction of conspiracy to traffic must be reversed. See Velunza, 504 So.2d at 782; see also Voto v. State, 509 So.2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miranda v. State, 530 So. 2d 1103, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, 1988 WL 96060 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
530 So. 2d 1103 (Miranda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Velunza v. State
504 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Voto v. State
509 So. 2d 1291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)