Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miranda v. State

Miranda v. State

530 So. 2d 1103, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, 1988 WL 96060
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-797
StatusPublished

This text of 530 So. 2d 1103 (Miranda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miranda v. State, 530 So. 2d 1103, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, 1988 WL 96060 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we conclude that the evidence of the appellant’s participation in the sale of cocaine to undercover police supports his conviction of trafficking. Nonetheless, there is no proof of an express or implied agreement to commit the offense and his conviction of conspiracy to traffic must be reversed. See Velunza, 504 So.2d at 782; see also Voto v. State, 509 So.2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Velunza v. State
504 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Voto v. State
509 So. 2d 1291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 So. 2d 1103, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, 1988 WL 96060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miranda-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.