Miranda v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services

467 So. 2d 747, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13284
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1985·No. No. 84-1990·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hanley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 334 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1976); McPhail v. Jenkins, 382 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1st DCA), pet. for rev. den. 338 So.2d 1115 (Fla.1980); and McAffee v. Kirkland, 362 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miranda v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services, 467 So. 2d 747, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13284 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

467 So. 2d 747 (Miranda v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lutgert v. Lutgert
338 So. 2d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
McPhail v. Jenkins
382 So. 2d 1329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hanley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
334 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
McAfee v. Kirkland
362 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)