Miranda-Gonzalez v. Garcia

13 F. App'x 11
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2001
DocketNo. 00-1852
StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 11 (Miranda-Gonzalez v. Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miranda-Gonzalez v. Garcia, 13 F. App'x 11 (1st Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court dismissed the habeas petition filed by Jesus Miranda-Gonzalez under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and petitioner has appealed. After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and in the district judge’s Opinion and Order. Specifically, petitioner’s double jeopardy argument is meritless because the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in prison disciplinary proceedings. Any due process argument also lacks merit because, even assuming, without deciding, that petitioner possessed some kind of liberty interest, he received all the process he was due under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974).

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolff v. McDonnell
418 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. App'x 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miranda-gonzalez-v-garcia-ca1-2001.