Miraglio v. Rivera

45 A.D.2d 1010, 358 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4254
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 29, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a support proceeding under article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated December 14, 1973, and made after a hearing, which committed appellant to the County Jail for six months because of his failure to comply with a prior order of support. Order reversed, on the facts, without costs; and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing and further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. We have repeatedly stated that the issue of ability to pay is crucial to a determination of willfulness and should be “ explored in depth” (Matter of Burchett v. Burchett, 43 A D 2d 970; Matter of Abbondola v. Abbondola, 40 A D 2d 976). The appellant’s contention of ill health and frequent periods of unemployment presented factual issues which merited scrutiny and the taking of proof by the court, as they tended to negate any inference of willful noncompliance. Here no competent proof was produced to sustain a finding of willfulness (cf. Matter of Jennings v. Jennings, 42 A D 2d 568). Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miraglio v. Rivera, 45 A.D.2d 1010, 358 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

45 A.D.2d 1010 (Miraglio v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pehush v. Pehush
61 A.D.2d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)