Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP.
925 N.E.2d 97, 14 N.Y.3d 766, 898 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 96
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied third-party appellant Lane and Sons Construction Corp.’s motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP., 925 N.E.2d 97, 14 N.Y.3d 766, 898 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 96 (N.Y. 2010).
925 N.E.2d 97 (Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.