Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP.

New York Court of Appeals

Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP.

925 N.E.2d 97, 14 N.Y.3d 766, 898 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 96

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 97 (Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miraglia v. H & L HOLDING CORP., 925 N.E.2d 97, 14 N.Y.3d 766, 898 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 96 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied third-party appellant Lane and Sons Construction Corp.’s motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied third-party appellant Lane and Sons Construction Corp.’s motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 97, 14 N.Y.3d 766, 898 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miraglia-v-h-l-holding-corp-ny-2010.