Miraglia v. Cohen

259 A.D. 744, 19 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6503

This text of 259 A.D. 744 (Miraglia v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miraglia v. Cohen, 259 A.D. 744, 19 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. No ooinion. Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Close, J:, dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the application on the ground no fraud is involved. The alterations were made before authentication and, as a result, concededly conformed Assembly and election districts to the districts in which the electors actually resided, as set forth in the nominating petitions. The mistake was palpable and under the circumstances the making of the alterations should not defeat the electors’ selections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 744, 19 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miraglia-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1940.