Mirae Asset Securities Co., Ltd. v. Ryze Renewables Holdings, LLC

Opinion

1 4 MIRAE ASSET SECURITIES CO., LTD., 5 Case No. 2:23-cv-01492-APG-NJK Plaintiff, 6 Order v. 7 [Docket No. 50] RYZE RENEWABLES HOLDINGS, LLC, et 8} al., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 50. Plaintiff seeks an extended discovery period and Defendants seek a stay of discovery. /d. at 7, 8. 12 Defendants fail to address the relevant standards for a stay of discovery. To the extent 13 Defendants seek a stay of discovery, a request must be filed identifying the governing standards 14 and providing a meaningful discussion as to how they are met. See, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC 15 v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013); Arik v. Meyers, 2020 WL 515843, at *1 (D. Nev. 16] Jan. 31, 2020). 17 Accordingly, the parties’ proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 50. The parties must submit a renewed joint discovery plan and scheduling order no later than 19] February 7, 2024. Any motion to stay discovery must be filed no later than February 7, 2024. 21 Dated: February 1, 2024 “5 22 PRS a Nancy. J. Kopoe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28