Mirabile v. Profy

95 A.D.2d 800, 464 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18722

This text of 95 A.D.2d 800 (Mirabile v. Profy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirabile v. Profy, 95 A.D.2d 800, 464 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated August 24, 1982, as dismissed their complaint against defendant Profy for lack of jurisdiction over said defendant. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. (See Chalk v Catholic Med. Center of Brooklyn & Queens, 58 AD2d 822; Glickman v Horowitz, 66 AD2d 814.) Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chalk v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn
58 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Glikman v. Horowitz
66 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.2d 800, 464 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirabile-v-profy-nyappdiv-1983.