Mirabello v. Gangi

85 A.D.2d 622, 449 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440

This text of 85 A.D.2d 622 (Mirabello v. Gangi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirabello v. Gangi, 85 A.D.2d 622, 449 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated August 20, 1980, which denied appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing 14 of the plaintiffs’ 23 causes of action, the appellants failed to sustain their burden of setting forth evidentiary facts sufficient to entitle them to judgment as a matter of law (cf. Yates v Dow Chem. Co., 68 AD2d 907, 909). Their motion was properly denied. Rabin, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. Dow Chemical Co.
68 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.D.2d 622, 449 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirabello-v-gangi-nyappdiv-1981.