Mirabelli v. Voight

30 A.D.3d 486, 816 N.Y.S.2d 372

This text of 30 A.D.3d 486 (Mirabelli v. Voight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirabelli v. Voight, 30 A.D.3d 486, 816 N.Y.S.2d 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), entered May 18, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants demonstrated prima facie their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with proof establishing that the plaintiff Jennifer Mirabelli’s medical condition was not causally related to the accident of July 1, 2002. In response, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether that plaintiffs medical condition was caused by the accident (see Carrasco v Mendez, 4 NY3d 566 [2005]; Ranzie v Abdul-Massih, 28 AD3d 447 [2006]; Fusco v Barnwell House of Tires, Inc., 16 AD3d 620 [2005]; Sherin v Roda, 14 AD3d 604 [2005]). Adams, J.P, Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pommells v. Perez
830 N.E.2d 278 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
Sherin v. Roda
14 A.D.3d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Fusco v. Barnwell House of Tires, Inc.
16 A.D.3d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ranzie v. Abdul-Massih
28 A.D.3d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 486, 816 N.Y.S.2d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirabelli-v-voight-nyappdiv-2006.