Mirabelli v. Mirabelli
This text of 186 N.E.2d 605 (Mirabelli v. Mirabelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decrees affirmed. By decree in the Probate Court, a husband was committed to jail for contempt by reason of his failure to pay $50 of arrears in payments directed by an earlier decree of separate support. He was released from jail upon making payment. Assuming (without deciding) that this matter relating to a civil contempt is not moot (see Kenworthy & Taylor, Inc. v. State Examrs. of Electricians, 320 Mass. 451, 453 — 454; Garabedian v. Commonwealth, 336 Mass. 119, 120), the report of material facts reveals no error. Upon a petition in equity, the husband by decree was directed to return to the wife certain rings or the value thereof, and to pay to her one half of the cash wedding gifts to the couple, who separated less than two months after their marriage. The evidence is conflicting and confused. No stenographer was present on one day of trial, and the parties then agreed to proceed despite the absence of a stenographer. The evidence thus is not all before us. Upon this record, we cannot say that the probate judge was not justified in his findings (a) as to the amount of the cash gifts, and (b) that the husband had “obtained possession of . . . [the] rings.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 N.E.2d 605, 345 Mass. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirabelli-v-mirabelli-mass-1962.