Mioducki v. Becht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mioducki v. Becht

285 A.D. 863, 137 N.Y.S.2d 855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 863 (Mioducki v. Becht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mioducki v. Becht, 285 A.D. 863, 137 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We regard the order appealed from as a discretionary order and we see no reason to disturb the discretion of the Special Term. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiff to serve a further bill of particulars, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McGurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We regard the order appealed from as a discretionary order and we see no reason to disturb the discretion of the Special Term. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiff to serve a further bill of particulars, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McGurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 863, 137 N.Y.S.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mioducki-v-becht-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack