Mioducki v. Becht
285 A.D. 863, 137 N.Y.S.2d 855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We regard the order appealed from as a discretionary order and we see no reason to disturb the discretion of the Special Term. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiff to serve a further bill of particulars, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McGurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mioducki v. Becht, 285 A.D. 863, 137 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).
285 A.D. 863 (Mioducki v. Becht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baldwin v. Tinker
48 Misc. 2d 362 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Sakolish v. Lilga
25 Misc. 2d 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)