Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Miodownik v. Miodownik

Miodownik v. Miodownik

259 A.D. 851, 19 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6969
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 851 (Miodownik v. Miodownik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miodownik v. Miodownik, 259 A.D. 851, 19 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

In an action brought for the annulment of a marriage on the ground of fraud, judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence is adequate to support the findings that defendant, by fraudulent representations of love and affection, induced the plaintiff to marry him when his true purpose was to secure entry into this country by securing a preferential visa as the husband of a United States citizen. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Travis A. v. Vilma B.
2021 NY Slip Op 04996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova Gonzalez
320 F.2d 898 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Babis v. Babis
75 A.2d 580 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 851, 19 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miodownik-v-miodownik-nyappdiv-1940.