MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC v. 645 W 27, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC v. 645 W 27, LLC

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 2021

Docket21-0426

StatusPublished

This text of MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC v. 645 W 27, LLC (MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC v. 645 W 27, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC v. 645 W 27, LLC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 23, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-426 Lower Tribunal No. 20-15342 ________________

Mio Gourmet Products, LLC, Appellant,

vs.

645 W 27 LLC, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law LP, and Julio C. Marrero, for appellant.

The O’Boyle Law Firm, P.C., and Jonathan R. O’Boyle (Deerfield Beach), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Garrison v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 298 So. 3d 116, 118 (Fla.

1st DCA 2020) (“The consequence of not filing exceptions [to a general

magistrate’s report and recommendation] is a failure to preserve the issue

for appellate review.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI