Minzer v. Heffner Agency, Inc.

214 A.D.2d 547, 625 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages arising out of the service of an information subpoena with restraining notice, Heffner Agency, Inc. appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated March 2, 1993, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, [548] and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 21, 1994, as denied its motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 2, 1993, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 21, 1994; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 21, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Hurowitz in his March 2, 1993, order; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minzer v. Heffner Agency, Inc., 214 A.D.2d 547, 625 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 547 (Minzer v. Heffner Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Saretsky
171 Misc. 2d 404 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)