Minyard Davis v. David Simons
This text of 594 F. App'x 141 (Minyard Davis v. David Simons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Davis v. Simons, No. 2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Davis also claims the district court erred by not granting a preliminary injunction against Defendant prison officials. Because we affirm the district court’s decision on the merits in this respect, we conclude that the appeal from the effective denial of preliminary relief is moot. See Univ. of Tex. v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981); Dex Media West Inc. v. City of Seattle, 696 F.3d 952, 956 n. 1 (9th Cir.2012); Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir. 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 F. App'x 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minyard-davis-v-david-simons-ca4-2015.