Minus v. DAK Americas

125 F. App'x 503
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2005·No. No. 04-2544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gussie Minus appeals the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge recommending summary judgment in favor of DAK Americas in Minus’ employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation from which Minus appeals does not constitute an order over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minus v. DAK Americas, 125 F. App'x 503 (4th Cir. 2005).

125 F. App'x 503 (Minus v. DAK Americas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)