Mintz v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. of London & Edinburgh

90 N.Y.S. 1106
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1106 (Mintz v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. of London & Edinburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mintz v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. of London & Edinburgh, 90 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon full consideration we cannot find that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, or that reversible error was committed at the trial. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mintz-v-north-british-mercantile-ins-co-of-london-edinburgh-nyappterm-1904.