Mintz v. Kurfees

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mintz v. Kurfees

110 S.E.2d 600, 251 N.C. 95, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 695

DecidedOctober 21, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E.2d 600 (Mintz v. Kurfees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mintz v. Kurfees, 110 S.E.2d 600, 251 N.C. 95, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 695 (N.C. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.'

Defendants make twenty-four assignments of error. Each of these has been carefully considered. The pleadings and the evidence adduced in support thereof make a case for the jury. The case was submitted to the jury upon instructions conforming to settled principles of law. The jury has resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiff. In the trial of the cause we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

HiggiNS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.'

Defendants make twenty-four assignments of error. Each of these has been carefully considered. The pleadings and the evidence adduced in support thereof make a case for the jury. The case was submitted to the jury upon instructions conforming to settled principles of law. The jury has resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiff. In the trial of the cause we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

HiggiNS, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.E.2d 600, 251 N.C. 95, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mintz-v-kurfees-nc-1959.